Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Lou's response-psowlisah

Posted by zazenducke on March 28, 2012, at 12:35:12

In reply to Re: Lou's response-psowlisah » zazenducke, posted by SLS on March 28, 2012, at 11:56:29

> > I'm sorry your feelings were hurt by the slang "druggin"
>
> I don't feel that it is your place to apologize to me on behalf of Lou Pilder.

It's not an apology Scott, it's an expression of sympathy.
>
> > I occasionally use it myself as a synonym for tireless pharmaceutical experimentation.
>
I was trying to ease your pain by explaining to you that the expression is not offensive to many people.

> This is a personal choice for you to make. Your choice is irrelevant to me, and does not mitigate the hurt I felt.

Being hurt is your choice Scott I was just trying to offer a perspective that might help you feel better. I'm sorry it didn't help. I thought it might be relevant because we were fellow human beings.
>
> > You posted that you loved Lou. Do you think having a rule in place that will preclude him from posting on threads that are open to others will be a loving response to Lou?
>
> That I love Lou does not immunize him from the consequences of his behaviors nor does it make my hurt any less of a consequence.

Is it possible that being hurt is the result of your interpretation of his behavior rather that the behavior itself?
>
> > Do you remember the rule of 3? Do you believe it was put in place primarily because of complaints about one particular member?
>
> I lobbied for the rule because I found the behavior of a single member of the posting community to be disruptive.
>
> > What about the rule that Lou is not allowed to talk about the Nazis?
>
> What about it? Is there anything about my behavior that would lead you to ask me that question?

No it has nothing to do with your behavior. I didn't remember that you had anything to do with the rule of three. I was asking if you felt it was fair to exclude one member of the site from full participation. To create a little posting ghetto with special rules for a subset of the population?
>
> > Why is he being singled out?
>
> What is he being singled out for?

Not being allowed to post about the Nazis. The rule of 3. Being the subject of Bob's question to you about your feelings about his post. Not being the subject of Bob's expressed concern about his feelings about others' posts.

Why?


>
>
> - Scott
>
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. That was not my intention.


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:zazenducke thread:1014240
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1014332.html