Posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2011, at 9:02:34
In reply to Lou's reminder and-request for rationale(s) (4), posted by Lou Pilder on January 1, 2011, at 4:47:28
> > > > > > > > Here is a site that includes some of what I am prohibited from posting here
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you're prohibited from posting something here, please don't post how to find it elsewhere.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But please don't take this personally, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person, and I'm sorry if this hurts you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More information about posting policies is in the FAQ:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforce
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Follow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration. They, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bob
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mr. Hsiung, Please redirect this to the admin board for I do not know the mechanics in doing so.
> > > > > > You wrote,[...If you're prohibited from posting something here, please don't post how to find it elsewhere...].
> > > > > > I am unsure as to what you are referring to here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond according.
> > > > > > The two prohibition that I know of are
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1 That I do not post that it has been revealed to me from the god that I give service and worship to a commandment to me that I (redacted by respondent)
> > > > > > 2. That I do not post what could be about the involvment in any way concening paychiatry or the chemistry that is in the historical record concerning a particular historical time period.
> > > > > > Here are my concerns.
> > > > > > A. Your statement to me states that one here can not post {how to find} those facts concerning those prohibitions by you. Here are some of my concerns:
> > > > > > 1A. Could one here post that there will be a TV program airing on a particular channel at a particular time concerning those prohibitions by you from posting here?
> > > > > > 2A. Could one post here to purchase a book at a particular store concerning those prohibitions from posting by you here?
> > > > > > 3A. Could someone post here to go to an expert on the history of Judaism to discuss and find out about the prohibitions from posting by you here?
> > > > > > 4A. Could someone post here to go to the site of the Anti-Defamation League and ask them to discuss the prohibitons from posting as you state here?
> > > > > > 5A. Is there a balance here with your (redacted by respondent)
> > > > > > 6A. I want to give infomation that I think here will save lives and that infomation could be in what you prohibit from posting here. But now you say that I can not post here how to get that infomation. If you think redacted by respondent)
> > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > >
> > > > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > > > Your prohibition that one here can not post telling how one could obtain infomation that you prohibit to be posted here brings up what you are doing here in relation to how you direct people to what is prohibited here.
> > > > > You have posted a link that directs one to a table of contents that one could use to see a prohibited statement. You say that one would have to click twice to see it so you allow that way to see the prohibited, by you, content. You also have a post here with a search feature that one can look up what could be prohibited to post here. So there are ways to lead members to what you prohibit from posting, and even that you have used the table of contents method to allow members to see what you prohibit from posting.
> > > > > Now I think that my format of having a member to click at least twice to see what you prohibit from posting is no different {from an ethical perspective} from that you have provided a link to what you posted, which was prohibited content, that leads to a table of contents that could allow mwmbers to see what you prohibit from posting used the table of contents method to allow mwmbers to see what was once posted by you, that you posted and then . I also think that by you allowing a search page for members that they could find what was removed to be in an ethical perspective to be analogous to the table of contents method that you use here to allow people to see what you say is prohibited from being posted. You see, I, in good faith, followed your example and can not understand why there is any difference, for my way and your way still allow members to see what you prohibit from posting.
> > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > >
> > > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > > In accordance with your policy that if someone here wants to know your rationale for something to just please ask, and to post a reminder that requests are outstanding, I am asking that you please post here your rationale(s) for the following:
> > > > A. I have several requests to you here and by them remaining outstanding, there could be IMHO people that could die or suffer a life-ruining condition as a result of me not knowing the answers from you to my requests in the above posts and thearfore being not permitted by you to post here {where they can find the infomation} until I have answers from you concerning the ways that I have asked you here as to if they can be permitted by you or not. If you posted answers to my requests, then I could either post here a way that you permit to find infomation that you say I can not {tell them how to find it elsewhere} or seek some other way to get what I think could be life-saving infomation or infomation that could prevemt a life-ruing condition that could be brought on by the drugs in question.
> > > > B. What also is your rationale for you allowing yourself to post a link to a table of contents that has prohibited content and you say that it can be done by you since one needs to click twice to see it. The rationale I am asking for here is if I can not do that by using the format that I use that needs more than one click, why can you use the 2 click format and if I can not, what is your rationale for that?
> > > > C. If I can use the 2 click format, then what is your rationale for telling me that I can not tell others how they can obtain infomation (if they have to click more than once, which gardenergirl here has pointed out that they have to click many times)?
> > > > D. One of your prohibitions concerns the foundation of Judaism. What is your rationale (redacted by respondent)
> > > > Lou Pilder
> > >
> > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > In accordancwe with your policy to keep reminding you of outstanding requests and such, the above. It is of particular importance to me now to have dialog with you concerning my requests to you here for there could be people that die as a result IMHO from not being allowed by you to have infomation from me posted here or for me to be allowed to post here where they can find that information that I think could be life-saving and/or prevent them from getting a life-ruining condition.
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your policy here, the above.
> > My concerns now here are even more urgent for there are members here posting that I think could be helped if they were allowed to get information from me that you prohibit from posting here or even posting here where they can find it. Now I think that what I could post as to at least where to find it elsewhere could be life-saving and/or prevent one from getting a life-ruining condition.
> > I am asking now if you could have another psychiatrist post here to affirm your policy here of not allowing me to post where members could find what I am prohiibited from posting here. If you could do that, then I could respond to your guest speaker here. Now the areas of prohibition involve two decades of human history which some historians say is one of the most, if not the most important time in the history of humanity and by learning from that, the same mistakes in that time period could be looked at and others could learn from those mistakes. And is not learning one of the goals of this forum? And then there is the foundation of Judaism in relation to that it has been revealed to me a commandment from my God to me that I (redacted by respondent) so that I would like for your guest psychiatrist, if any, to post first concerning those aspects. There are more that I think that if I was allowed to post where others could get the information that that information is important also to help save lives.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> As to your policy here to keep remindinng you, the above.
> Lou Pilder
> PS I also would like to add the folowing:
> E. In your prohibition to me not to post here where people can find information concerning what you have prohibited me from posting here, could I post here for members to email me for this information?
> F. If not, and a member does email me for this information, would you do anything to that member that does email me and ask me for the information assuming you found out? If so, what would you do to those that do email me for the information?
> G. What could be any consequences ,if any, in your thinking, to the ones that do obtain the information that you say I can not tell others where to find? If they received the prohibited information and it helped them to make a more informed decision as to take a mind-altering drug that could cause death or a life-ruining condition, could that be harmful or not, to those that get the information, in your thinking?
> H. Are you in the understanding of any historical parallels to your sanction to me here to not post where others could find information that you prohibit from posting here? If you are, could you post here the era of time that has the parallel to your sanction to me here?
> K. Could you list other prohibited information that I have not listed here that you say can not be posted here as to where one can find it elsewhere? If not, could you post your rationale, if any, to justify such a rule by you?
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
In regars to your reminder policy, the above.
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:967900
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/999444.html