Posted by Lou Pilder on April 25, 2011, at 8:28:30
In reply to Lou's reminder-owpstn-krhmnhg?, posted by Lou Pilder on April 11, 2011, at 10:28:45
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In regards to your reminder procedure, there is now another outstanding notificatio from me.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung and his assistant.
In regards to your procedure to keep remimding you of outstanding requests, the notification in question is still outstanding.
I am unsure as to why my request for the notification to be acted on according to your TOS here is outstanding. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. Do you still hold to your thinking that one match could cause a forest fire?
B. Do you still hold to your thinking that you do not wait to act on statments posted here that could lead one to feel put down/accused?
C. Do you agree now that if a statement is not acted on by you here, that by leaving it unsanctioned, someone could think that it is within the rules here to think in the terms of what is allowed to stand?
D. Do you still hold to your policy here that support takes precedence as you have previously posted here?
E. Your policy in your TOS is that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole. Could you post here if you have a reason (rationale) to leave my requests outstanding as then to be good for the community as a whole? If so, what could happen in the future by leaving my requests outstanding that will be good for the community as a whole?
F. Do you agree that {indoctrination} could happen by leaving my requests outstanding? If so, do you think that the indoctrination will be good for the community as a whole? If so, could you post here why?
G. If the historical record shows that millions of Jewish children (redacted by respondent)
H. other aspects related to this ongoing situation.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:982469
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/983678.html