Posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2011, at 6:48:03
In reply to Lou's reply-in10nt » Kath, posted by Lou Pilder on August 21, 2009, at 6:24:37
> > Thx Lou,
> >
> > not sure what the rule of 3 is that's referred to in that link.
> >
> > Kath
>
> Kath,
> You wrote,[...not sure what the rule of 3...]
> The rule states that one can not post more then 3 consecutive posts and there are exceptions listed in the TOS here.
> The intent of the rule can be seen in some threads by comments and such. One intent is that there could be what Mr. Hsiung says is a {less confident} member and the rule is to accommodate that class of members that at this time I have posted a request to Mr. Hsiung to list the criteria that determine if one is a less confident member, for I have research articles concerning this and I could email them to you at your request.
> Another intent of the rule as stated in the TOS here is that if one posts more than 3 consecutive posts that they are in some way, that I do not understand, to be not sharing the board. There are ramifications to what Mr. Hsiung has posted concerning that that I would like to discuss by email. There are two aspects here. One is that no member is forced to be in a thread or to take a test about what is in a thread. Also, the board is open and members are free to join in a thread or go to another thread or board for what they would like to discuss. The aspect of an open forum is different from a closed situation like a classroom where members are held accountable for the content whereas here no member is requierd to join any thread.
> But the overiding aspect of the rule, to me, is that I can not post after 3 consecutive posts unless someone else posts. I have asked that other members to not post just to make a post after my 3 posts unless their concern in the thread is to add to the aspects posted.
> The rule also has a very great effect on my ability to respond to Mr. Hsiung in relation to his TOS here in regards to ask about his rationales, discuss rules, discuss his actions and such for after 3 posts I can not continue unless Mr. Hsiung or someone else replies in the thread.
> The following link to a post has two links to other posts that show that Mr. Hsiung knows that if a post has a statement that is not addressed by him that he agrees that members and others could think that it is acceptable. This means that statements that could lead a Jew to feel put down or accused that are left unsanctioned could cause others to think that what is not sanctioned is acceptable here. This could IMO based on the historical record to be an open flame for hatred toward the Jews to be spread to other forums and communities. I could at your request email you with the links to those type of posts so I would like for you to reasd the links in the following.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081003/msgs/863780.htmlKath,
There are other aspects now. Could you email me?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:906568
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/979453.html