Posted by Lou Pilder on February 10, 2011, at 11:33:44
In reply to Lou's reply-pahllzkunklew? » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on February 10, 2011, at 11:18:41
> Mr. Hsiung,
> What you wrote to me here is a statement that is incomplete. I am unsure as to why you did not post the whole sentence by me here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> A. Why did you leave out the part that I posted in the statement that you used here?
> B. Is the statement in its complete form factual?
> C. If you agree that it is, then what is your rationale for pposting to me what you posted?
> D. Now I have the posts that substantiate that the statement in question is factual. But I am unsure by your rule to me concerning posting links to othere posts here as to if I could or could not post the links here. You say that you try to be fair in your TOS here. Is it considered by you to be fair in not posting the whole context of my statement in question here? I can not post the posts in question that substantiate that it is factual. If so, what is your rationale for it being fair by you to post an incomplete statement by me and to not allow me to post the links here that substantiate that the statement is factual when posted in toto? You see, when a statement is posted and something is left out that could change the meaning, that is different from just leaving something out that can not change the meaning ,and I think that what is left out could change the meaning as that there are the posts in question that do say what is in question. Now a lot of things here IMHO coukd be changed that I think could save lives by you posting answers to the following. I am asking that you:
> A. post the statement in question in its full context
> B. Allow me to post the links to posts here that substantiate that the statement is factual.
> C. Allow an inpartial third-party to post their opinion(s) here after both me and you send our position to him/her.
> D. other aspects
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
To correct the above, in part (A), what I was requesting is that you go to the original post by you to me here and revise the wording of the statement in question to have the full statement by me that you cited instead of the statement that you posted with the part of the sentence left out.
In (B), the correction is that instead of allowing me to post the links in question, that you agree to review the links in a reasonable time frame, that I will email to you, and then pick which posts that you will allow the links to the posts to be posted or not.
In the selection of an impartial 3erd party, I will agree to allow you to pick such a person since they will be impartial.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:960260
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/979050.html