Posted by Lou Pilder on January 21, 2012, at 11:24:00
Mr. Hsiung and his deputy,
In response to your TOS here, I am requesting that we have dialog concerning what I think could save lives here or prevent someone fron getting a life-ruining condition.
One of your TOS here is the following:
[I want to be open to feedback, but if you could also please try to accept what I decide and trust that I'm doing my best to be fair and to do what I think will be good for this community as a whole, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks]
Let us look at the componants of this statement from you here.
A. I want to be open to feedback
B. please try to accept what I decide
C. trust that I'm doing my best to be fair
D. and to do what I think will be good for this community as a whole.
When I joined this community, I read that and accepted that what you wrote was true. And how many others could have accepted what you have said to them to?
And going on in your TOS here you state that you do not wait to sanction a post because one match could start a forest fire. You also stated that if something is not supportive to not post it for support takes precedence. I took you at your word.
Now there are a lot of outstanding notifications from me and outstanding requests that IMHHHHHHO, as a result of them being outstanding, could cause the death of someone or could be considered by some to be an indoctrination to the readers to use a Jew for an outlet of one's sadism.
But you say that this community is for support and education. And you say that what you do will be in your thinking be good for this community as a whole. Good for the community as a whole to have outstanding notifications for days, weeks months and years? How many others could be led to think that to?
You say that you want to be open to feedback. I took you at your word.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1007978
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1007978.html