Posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 9:21:03
In reply to Lou's remimder to Mr. Hsiung-psuhpoart, posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 7:05:18
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your reminder procedure, I sent two more notifications a few days ago and they are outstanding.
> Now it is my understanding that the administration of the site has the function to provide support for the members in relation to that notifications alert the administration to either take action to prevent potential harm to members from posts that contain statements that have the potential to inflict emotional/psychological harm to a member or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why the statement in question as allowed to stand by you.
> This brings up the possibilities that could exist as to the administration not either attending to the notification in the thread where the statement in question appears, or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why it is not attended to. These possibilities have IMO broad implications that I would like to have clarified.
> In relation to that you have asked me to send notifications to you again previously, I have already told you that I feel that by you asking me to send them again that I am being subjected to additional conditions to have a notification responded to so could you please not ask me again to resend a notification, for I feel pressured when you do that after I have posted to you that I will not resend notifications unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find the notification that I have a confirmation of sending it to you other than me sending it to you over again.
> At this juncture, you have posted here in relation to my requests for attending to notifications as reminders by me that they are outstanding the following explanations as to why they are outstanding.
> A. You have {missed}them
> B. Some can not be answered by the administration as to that you wrote {we}.{then some can?}
> C. Some you need more time to attend to (could you email me with that reason to the ones that are related to that reason?)
> D. A deputy of yours has posted that a notification by me was known but was deleted by them.
> E. (redacted by resondent)
> F.. other reasons not stated
> Now I do not know what you are wanting to mean by {missed} nor do I know which reason you are using as to why the notifications remain outstanding. But you have posted that you want to attend to statements quickly as in comparison to that a small fire could turn into a forest fire. I have taken you at your word.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung ,
I wrote to you that I feel that by you asking me to resend notifications, even after I have told you that I will not unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find it unless I resend it, that that is in my thinking an additional condition to me that I will do not want to be subjected to. This still stands, but I do want to correct that after reviewing this ongoing situation that I do not feel pressured by you when you ask me to resend notifications. I apologize for writing that, for that is not what I intended to post here concerning my feelings about this ongoing situation.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:917918
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090813/msgs/917926.html