Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung-pstilbrning

Posted by Lou Pilder on July 5, 2009, at 10:07:48

In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung-efctsnprsnt?, posted by Lou Pilder on November 25, 2008, at 6:20:08

> > > DR. Hsiung,
> > > In your response concerning the ongoing discussion here that involves posts here that have been used for centuries in tactics of historical state-sponsored antisemitism, and have IMO the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or IMO to foster defamation toward Jews due to that those posts in question are not sanctioned IMO as other posts of the same nature that accuse or put down others or are not sensitive to the feeelings of others, I have asked that those posts be notated as being uncivil. You have posted:
> > > [...the question for me hasn't been whether they're discriminatory, but whether it's {more helpful} to focus on the past or on the present...].
> > > I ask if you could clarify:
> > > A. Are you saying that you not concerned at all about discrimination here?
> > > B. Are you saying that even if there is discrimination, you will not notate those posts as uncivil because it is {more helpful}to not notate them as being uncivil?
> > > If so,
> > > 1.could you clarify as to what you mean by who, if it is members, it could be {more helpful} to, by not sanctioning the posts in question as other posts are?
> > > 2. Are you saying that some members here could be helped here by continueing to leave posts of the nature in question unnotated as being uncivil? If so, how could those members be helped by that?
> > > 3. Are you saying that it would be more helpful to the Jewish community to leave posts of the nature in question unnotated as being uncivil? If so, how could it be more helpful to them?
> > > 4. Are you saying that it would be more helpful to the community as a whole to leave posts of the nature in question unnotated as being uncivil? If so, I am a member of the whole, so could you write here how in your opinion it could be more helpful to me?
> > > 5.something else
> > > C. Could you clarify as to why you were willing to remedy a post that used language that put down Christians, and are not willing at this time to remedy posts that IMO have language that puts down Jews?
> > > D. Have you rescinded your statement here that says that one match can start a forest fire?
> > > E. other clarifications
> > > Lou Pilder
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060826/msgs/686322.html
> > >
> >
> > Dr. Hsiung,
> > Your replies to me to the above requests of mine to you were something like asking me if I have considered asking those in another thread about research, and that you have not rescinded your statement that one match {can} start a forest fire and something like that new matches have a better chance of starting a fire than used ones.
> > I am requesting to find out from you if that is the only answer you are going to give me concernibng my original requests to you or not.
> > If it is, then I am unsure as to if in my request to you in (A), if you mean from your answwr to me that you are not concerned about discrimination here at all or if you are. I would like for you to clarify that for me.
> > If your answer is the only answer that you will post here in this thread, then I am unsure as to in (B),if you are saying from your answer that even if there is discrimination, you will not notate those posts as uncivil because it is{more helpful}to not notate them as uncivil.
> > Then I am unsure as to if your answer means, if it is going to be your only answer, that if you mean (B), how your answer clarifies in (1),who it could be more helpful to, and in (2)how could members, if there are any, be helped by leaving those posts in question un noteted as being uncivil, and in (3), if you are saying that it could be more helpful to members of the Jewish community to leave the posts in question unsanctioned that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, and in (4) if you are saying that it would be more helpfull for the community as a whole to leave those posts not notated as being uncivil. I am a member of the whole and I am asking if your answer says that it would be more helpful to me to leave those posts not notated as uncivil, how could in your opinion,that be?
> > I also asked for you to clarify why you are unwilling at this time to remedy posts that put down Jews, when you have done so with a post that put down Christians. Does your answer answer that? If so, could you clarify how, for I am unsure about this at this time.
> > Lou PIlder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In regards to your reminder procedure, the above.
> Lou Pilder
>

Mr. Hsiung,
In regards to your reminder provision, the above.
Lou Pilder

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


[905048]

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:713673
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090529/msgs/905048.html