Posted by myco on April 7, 2009, at 17:37:13
In reply to Re: *********THE NEW RULE BOOK************, posted by JadeKelly on April 7, 2009, at 17:04:41
This is good wording. d/r also had some good wording. Logical advice and questions here.
So we have here some straight up logical easily dealt with questions that will the bring the board closer to an agreement.
I would like to see admin address each question thoroughly not vaguely not by throwing questions back and turning them around on the posters.
Issue number one...two...three....provide answers.
Example, from my own experience ok. A joke can and should be posted in any context, including "dirty" if the poster so chooses as long as the subject line indicates its potential to cause offence. I raised this point but it was not addressed at all...not even mentioned in his response. That is a logical easy to deal with question...how much more simple.
Both Jade and d/r had simple addressable issues as well nicely laid out and yet none were addressed accordingly...just spit back at the poster or completely ignored. How does that indicate to anyone that there is any cooperation available from admin?
It's all turned back around. Thats why I mentioned is it worth it. I agree fight to get people back sure and change the block rules to less time...I remember some poor poster, if memory is working, got blocked for a bizarre 52 weeks? lol I mean why...lol. And what was even more bizarre was some formula posted to calculate such a punishment. I dont know....i dont see that as logic myself but hey...
dont read me wrong posters...i am in defense of you but its not getting very far. time for alternative solutions ya know
my own passion to see something change keeps dragging me back into this debate lol
m
poster:myco
thread:888433
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090302/msgs/889277.html