Posted by Lou Pilder on December 29, 2008, at 13:31:22
In reply to Blocked for a week » Dena, posted by Deputy Dinah on December 28, 2008, at 8:32:05
> > All one has to do is read some of Luther's or Calvin's writings, to see how antiSemitic they were.
>
> > Methinks Jesus wants His reputation back...!
>
> Please don't post anything that could lead others, including Lutherans, Calvinists, or other Christians to feel accused (for example, of antisemetism) or put down.
>
> > Why is the real issue swept under the proverbial rug, while a petty side-issue is hyper-focused on? Clever tactic, if it weren't so poorly over-used.
>
> I'd also like to remind you, when you return, not to post anything that could lead posters who happen to be deputies to feel accused or put down.
>
> Dr. Bob is always free to override deputy decisions. His email is on the bottom of each page. Please feel free to email him if you believe this decision was made in error. Please also contact him directly with any complaints about deputy action/inaction. He *is* around. It might help to receive a reply to put "Babble" and maybe "deputy complaint" in the subject line.
>
> You've been reminded to be civil already in this thread, so I'm going to have to block you from posting for one week.
>
> Dinah, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob
>
> Also, I did respond to your notification, but I didn't get a copy of it either so there may have been a glitch. I'll resend that information.Dinah,
I am unsure as to some aspects of your post to Dena here.
In,[...don't post what could lead Lutherans, Calvanists and other Christians to feel put down/accused...]
Dena's post was about,[...how they {were}...](the writings in the past). The past tense is about those writings in the past so I am unsure as to what your rationale(s) could be to post here that the people that you refer to could be led to feel accused/put down about what was in the past. If you could post here your rationale(s) for posting that the people in question could be led to feel put down/accused when they read that past writings were of the nature in question, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. Also, in order for anyone to make that conclusion that they could feel accused/put down, could it not be that the people that you are referring could be contacted first to have the determination made by them and if you are the one feeling accused/put down when you read it, could you post then your rationale for such? If not, could you post your rationale(s) for that here and then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly?
I am also requesting that the sanction to Dena concerning the parts in question that have a want for infomation for, be redacted untill you post your rationale(s) so that myself and others could post here their response to your rationale(s) as to if it does or does not substantiate that what Dena posted as in question could lead or not lead anyone to feel put down or accused if they read what Dena posted about the historical writings in question, for it is my deep conviction that the statement by Dena is not a charge to anyone alive, for the writings in question were written around the period of 500 years ago.
As far as you posting about a {glitch), I am unsure as to what a glitch could be here, so could you elaborate on what a {glitch} could be as to what you think happened that could cause Dena not to receive a reply to her notification?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:863266
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/871297.html