Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Lou's request for help-cnsqunof

Posted by Geegee on September 26, 2008, at 11:26:54

In reply to Lou's request for help-cnsqunof, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2008, at 7:14:50

> > > [Dr.] Hsiung and his deputies,
> > > In regards to posting a reminder of an outstanding notification, I sent a notification on 9/23/08 that is outstanding.
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > Friends,
> > I am requesting help from any member here in regards to the outstanding notification. If you could email me, then I could explain the circumstances as to why I am asking for help and what kind of help that I am requesting concerning the outstanding notification.
> > Lou
> > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
>
> Friends,
> If you are considering posting in this thread, or emailing me, then I would like for you to click on this link to see what the policy here is concerning allowing posts to stand if the phrase {leaving it up} means similar to {allowed to stand}. I consider the phrase (leaving it up) to be that a statement in a post is allowed to stand and if the administration considers those statements to be different, I would like to see a rationale for such posted here and then I could respond accordingly.
> In the post to the link, it states that [Dr.] Hsiung takes responsibility for what he writes. One of the things that he writes is his TOS here. In his TOS here, a deputy/member writes that {...leaving it up means no rule has been broken...}. I do not see any refutation from [Dr.] Hsiung to the deputy/member's statement and without [Dr.] Hsiung posting otherwise, then I think there is the potential that others could think that that is the policy here. If someone could post where that is not the policy, then I could respond accordingly.
> Now if a statement in a post is allowed to stand, and if that could mean to some that there has been no rule broken, then that could lead IMO to the potential for very serious consequences emotionally and/or psychologically to some as a result of the statement in question being allowed to stand as that no rule has been broken.
> I invite any to email me to discuss this.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/423282.html



Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


[854196]

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Geegee thread:854052
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/854196.html