Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: These are our boards. » yxibow

Posted by gardenergirl on March 13, 2008, at 0:29:40

In reply to Re: These are our boards. » gardenergirl, posted by yxibow on March 11, 2008, at 1:16:24

You're right, of course. Literally, they are Dr. Bob's boards. At least that's what I think all that info from WHOIS, a cool resource, meant. :)

> I've since returned and now I see the usual algebra formulas for banning someone for eternity.
>
> 1 year??

Yeah, that's a really long time.
> its sometimes hard to always be "civil."

Too true. Especially if you are someone who says, "F*rt". Hmm, is there an eye rolling emoticon?
>
> I feel there is a difference between saying sh*t and whatever because of personal problems where grace under fire has not kicked in yet, and ad hominem, patently schadenfreude (there is no English equivalent) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude, and character assassination that they cross the border to not being "civil".

I agree.
>
> I do feel though that there should be a Uncivil forum, that nobody has to visit at all where people are banned and can all be filled with personality complexes until their banned state is exhausted.

Well, that could be an interesting board. I was thinking recently that maybe someone who is blocked could instead by significantly limited in posting...maybe to one post per day or a certain number per blocked week or something. And that privilege could then maybe be removed if they continue to post uncivil remarks.
>
> Perhaps I'm being a little naive and silly though, but I think if not, there should be bidirectional babblemail enabled anyhow, with either that the banned person cannot communicate with the person they just character assasinated, or if a person receives such a babblemail, they can press a box to ban the babblemail from said person.

Posters who are blocked aren't supposed to be able to send babblemails, so that should take care of the first scenario. I think the second is not unreasonable, especially if they could block one or more without having to turn Babblemail off entirely.
>
> Anyhow these are my opinions and while I think we have also had a few tonguelashings at ourselves I can view what you are trying to say

Thanks. I think we have, too, but I don't really remember them at the moment. I'm glad you came back.
>
> -- tidings

gg

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:gardenergirl thread:817260
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/817662.html