Posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 13:35:41
In reply to Lou's views-deleting posts, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 13:03:43
> > Yes, well the key word is "I" in the policy. It's about what Dr. Bob deems inappropriate enough to delete, not inappropriate in general or in anyone else's eyes.
> >
> > gg
>
> Friends,
> It is written here,[...it is about what (Mr. Hsiung) deems inappropriate enough to delete...].
> I think that then if that is the case, then IMO that could have the potential to lead some others to believe that posts that are allowed to stand could be thought by some to be appropriate here. If anyone would like to see these posts in question, they could email me if they like and have the opportunity to make your own determination as to if they are appropriate here.
> Lou
> lpilder_1188@fuse.netFriends,
The question that I see here is,[...what is not appropriate here so that it is deleted...?]
The rule in question that we are discussing is that deputies may delete posts of a particular nature as per the FAQ here, and it is fine to discuss rationales and the rules and such on this forum. The question that I see is {what is the definition of what is the rationale used to delete posts here?}
This brings up to me as to if a post is allowed to stand, does that mean that it does not satisfy the rationale for deleting it? For if it did satisfy the rationale for deleting it, then would it not have been deleted? And if not, why not?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:814293
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/814603.html