Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply to Dinah-letstnd » Deputy Dinah

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 12, 2008, at 10:27:17

In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dinah for criteria used-acus » Lou Pilder, posted by Deputy Dinah on January 12, 2008, at 9:24:11

> > If you could post them here, then I could have an understanding as to what you are wanting to mean and respond accordingly, for I am not at this time able to understand how offering members to email me for infomation could cause someone to feel accused.
> > Lou
>
> Offering to email members is not in violation of Babble civility guidelines. It's how you described the statements you were offering to email.
>
> You said:
>
> > Here in this forum, I could email you, if you like, statements posted here that have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, that are left to stand here. I could also show you the harm that those statements could cause.
>
> I replied:
>
> "Even though you didn't identify the posts or posters directly, you are saying that statements posted here (by Babble posters) have the potential to arouse antisemitic feelings and coud cause harm. The fact that you didn't identify those posters doesn't mean that poster's won't feel accused, and in fact more posters may feel accused as they wonder if it's their posts you are referring to."
>
> In the sentence of yours that I quoted, "I could email you, if you like," is the part that was fine.
>
> If you have any further questions on the civility guidelines (which are the criteria I used), you may find them at http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil.
>
> If you believe my decision was made in error, you may email Dr. Bob directly to request his review.
>
> Dinah, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob

Dinah,
You wrote,[...you are saying that statements posted here (by Babble posters)have the potential...]
Let us look at the whole statement by me. The whole statement was,[...staements posted here {that are left to stand}...]. It is the {that are left to stand} that is IMO the issue here.
You see, if statements are{ left to stand}, could not a reasonable person think that an accepted meaning of that phrase is that the statements in question are acceptable?
Lou

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:802861
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20071106/msgs/805889.html