Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's response to aspects of Glyden's post-3con

Posted by Lou Pilder on December 24, 2007, at 8:13:58

In reply to Re: » ny2bk, posted by Glydin on December 24, 2007, at 6:55:04

> I can understand your frustration. The fact is there is no coverage of threads going off topic in the policies. The monopolizing (or thread thiefs) of threads and BOARDS is suppose to be addressed by the three post guideline but there are no guidelines regarding the volume of posts to boards and the number of threads a poster can post to.
>
> I would like to see the med board, in particular, be more effective to the needs of "most" as opposed to needing the needs of, say, one..... sigh...
>
> I have seen where not addressing a problem on a board (IMO a problem), ends up becoming a cataylist for those so frustrated to be the ones who get PBCed. I think we should ALL be accountable for our posts. I have seen what appears lack of the application of accountibility to some posters..... I think that will continue.
>
> BTW, I have utilized the notify feature to ask regarding particular posts.

Friends,
It is written here,[...by the three post guidline but there are no guidlines regarding the volume of posts...and the number of threads a member can post to...].
I have the following concerns:
A. If there is not a guidline concerning the volume of posts, which could mean that a single post could be , let's say, 1000 words, then I am concerned that that in and of itself could show an intent of the maker of the three-consecutive-post rule.
B. If there is no restriction on the volume of a post, and the administration could consolodate three posts by one member, that do not have another member's name in between, and have the member's name just one time after the consolodation of the three posts, I am concerned that a motive by the maker of the three -consecutive post rule could be inferred.
C. It is written here,[...no guidlines as to the number of threads a member can post to...] I am concerned that such a rule, if it was innitiated, as to how the rule could be supportive to the mission of the forum which is for support and education.
The concerns of mine above, could or could not be concerns of other members here.
Lou

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:802413
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20071106/msgs/802419.html