Posted by Lou Pilder on July 13, 2007, at 16:06:31
In reply to Lou's reminder to DR. Hsiung-June22-comasawhol, posted by Lou Pilder on July 12, 2007, at 18:28:33
> DR.Hsiung,
> in accordance with your reminder procedure, In your statement on June 22,[...Perhaps before we post them,(posts that seek clarification or guidance regarding site rules), we could ask ourselves whether doing so is likely to be productive and construtive for the community as a whole...], I have the following requests in regards to your rationale, policy and actions that you take as to:
> A. I am unsure as to what you are wanting the statement, [...constructive and productive for the community as a whole...] to mean here.
> B. Could you give more clarification as to what you could want that to mean in regards to members posting requests to clarify and seek guidance regarding site rules by clarifying, let's say, how one request for clarification or guidance concerning site rules could bee good for the community as a whole and another request for clarification or guidance could not be good for the community as a whole?
> If you could, I could have the opportunity to have a better understanding of your rationale and actions you have taken and policy here and post accordingly.
> Here is the link to the firat time that I posted my request concerning this to you on June 22 which is in the last part of the post in response to your post.
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070605/msgs/764902.html
>Dr. Hsiung,
In my first request to you to clarify what you are wanting to mean by,[...good for the community as a whole...], your reply was that you would like to hear from members of the community.
The grammatical structure of your reply could mean that you could have pleasure in reading member's responses to what they think. I would also enjoy reading any replies from members here concerning what they think that you mean concerning,[...good for the community as a whole...].
However, there have been no replies from the members here to your request that you would like them to respond to your request to them for them to post what they think the statement means.
The TOS here states that if a member would like to know your rational, discuss actions that you take , policy and such, to post here their concerns to ask you. If you are making a new condition to the TOS here that you will not respond to my request untill another member posts thier response to your request, then I think that a new condition is something that could be put in the TOS for future requests by members and that my first request to you was my following the procedure to be followed and I am asking that you respond to my request here without waiting for other members to post a reply to you as per the procrdure given to members to receive a reply from you.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:769209
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/769400.html