Posted by Lou Pilder on May 6, 2007, at 20:38:19
In reply to Lou's rationale to Dr. Hsiung-April 9-B, posted by Lou Pilder on May 2, 2007, at 21:33:28
> > Dr. Hsiung,
> > In response to your procedure to keep reminding you, the following notification is outstanding.
> > Since the notifications go to you and also all of the deputies, they could respond to this request by me to respond to the notification. However, I was wondering if instead of me reminding you and the deputies of outstanding requests, that we explore some other way for me to receive a reply about my concerns in the notification, or that there be a post from the administration in the thread in question.
> > I have an idea. How about if the thread that the notification is about be redacted in it's entirerty untill the notification is responded to? Could that be something that you could consider?
> > Lou Pilder
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070423/msgs/754643.html
>
> Dr. Hsiung,
> My rationale for my above idea comes from that there are less active deputies at this time and that you may be occupied with other things to keep you from putting a lot of time on the forum.
> My idea doesn't delete the threads, for the thread could be reposted after the notification is reponded to.
> Lou PilderDr.Hsiung,
Since there are less deputies active now, I have an idea that I would like to know if you could consider.
Since one deputy has posted about a leave of a couple of months, how about if someone was appointed to take that deputy's place for those months? My idea would be to appoint someone from {outside of the membership} here that others could email to to address outstanding requests only. My idea is someone to post and then the mechanics could be done by one of the deputies which could eliminate some training involved. Do you think that my idea is reasonable?
Lou Pilder
>
>
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:755371
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070423/msgs/756408.html