Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » verne

Posted by Racer on April 21, 2007, at 19:00:54 [reposted on April 21, 2007, at 21:14:41 | original URL]

In reply to Babblemail Sucker Punch, posted by verne on April 21, 2007, at 18:38:57

>
>
> If deputies are allowed to send snide and sarcastic babblemails then I can't be safe here.

Isn't it possible that the babblemail in question was meant in all sincerity? With no sarcasm involved whatsoever?
Admittedly, I know who the deputy in question is, and I am basing this idea on my own experience of her. Still, I wonder if you might be jumping to conclusions based on insufficient evidence?
Racer, acting as a poster, NOT as a deputy

Thread

Babblemail Sucker Punch verne 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch Daisym 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » verne Racer 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch Gabbi-2 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » Racer verne 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch tofuemmy 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » tofuemmy verne 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch verne 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch tofuemmy 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » verne Honore 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » verne Happyflower 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch Happyflower 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch Happyflower 4/21/07
Re: Babblemail Sucker Punch » verne Gabbi-2 4/21/07
Blocked for a week » verne Dinah 4/21/07
...
Re: the length » Dr. Bob karen_kay 6/17/07

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Racer thread:752175
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070304/msgs/752177.html

	for
in