Posted by Lou PIlder on February 14, 2007, at 18:39:49
In reply to Lou's response to aspectsof notfred's post-B, posted by Lou PIlder on February 14, 2007, at 17:38:25
> > > Dr Bob asked Lou to resend it.
> > >
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727965.html
> >
> > Friends,
> > It is written here,[...resend it...]
> > I have sent the notification to Dr. Hsiung and, I guess, it also goes to all the 6 deputies. There was a reminder.
> > The policy here is that the administration will either email the requestor or post in the thread in question.
> > I have not received either an email from Dr. Hsiung that explaines the administration's position as to why no action is being taken, nor has ther been a post in the thread in question from the administration.
> > The deputy posts that if one posts on the administrative board that their notification has not been responded to, that that is {sufficient} to check for outstanding requests. I have posted such.
> > And another member posted for a notification and posted {thanks}. That could be affirming that the notification was checked for. That poster was not told to send it again.
> > If Dr. Hsiung wants me to send it again, I have asked for him for clarification and I am awaiting a reply from him before I send it again.
> > For if he has the notification that I sent to him, then why is there this condition to me to send it again when there was not the condition to the other member? If there is some exception, I would like that exception to be posted in this thread by DR. Hsiung and not a deputy.
> > I think that there is the potential, untill I receive the clarification from Dr. Hsiung that I have requested, for there to be the potential to think IMO that there are two standards here in relation to members using the notification feature here and I feel put down when I think that there is an additional condition to me than others to use the features offered to all the members here.
> > Lou
>
> Friends,
> There are wounds that can be deeply inflicted upon another human being by another human being. These wounds can be to the soul of a human. To feel put down could also have the feeling of being inferior.
> When one human being imposes a condition on another human being while allowing others to not have that condition imposed upon them, then the one discriminated upon could feel {inferior}. And the fostering of any feelings of inferiority is IMO an unsound mental-health practice.
> I believe that the imposing of an additional standard can have the potential to take away the dignity of a human being. I believe that the imposing of an aditional standard can have the potential to inflict a wound so deep that a person could lose their self-respect.
> I believe that there is a promise here on this forum to not allow what could put one down and a promise here that any fire of uncivilness will be put out immediatly, for one match can start a forest fire.
> What good could there be to one that is allowed at the lunch counter, but are told that the estblishment has the right to refuse service? In the name of humanity, I ask you to consider my concern here which is am I being subjected to another condition to have my notification responded to as others have their notifications responded to.
> LouFriends,
Let us look at the following post that is in this thread and then click on the offered link of another post in this thread.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/728184.html
Looking at the post from the offered link, there is part (B) and then looking back at the first offered link in this post here , it reads,[...This is because I did send such a notification using the proper feature and there has been no response to me from the administration...].
Friends, if you are wondering, I have sent the notification. And if it goes to all six of the deputies, then they could also be in receipt of the notification.
I have been asking that Dr. Hsiung confirm or not confirm that he has received the notification in question from me and I am unsure as to if his reply to me here means he is saying if he has or has not received it.But if he is saying that he has not, could not (B) that says,[...We have not received...]been reiterated to me? If not, in your opinions, why not?
Now one deputy has posted that she did not receive the notification in question. I have asked her to ask the other deputies if they have not received it or if they have received it. I am awaiting the reply from Dinah and then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:726277
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/732847.html