Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's request for clarification from Dr. Hsiung

Posted by Lou Pilder on December 23, 2006, at 10:17:27

DR. Hsiung,
In your policy here concerning your feature provided to members to reportposts to the administration, I had requested that you clarify as to;
A. Is the reply going to be a consensus of the 6 deputies and yourself?
B. Is the reply one deputies opinion? Was a poll taken?
C,D,E and F.
You replied[...consider the reply {from all of us}..]
I am unsure as to what you mean by that. Could any of the following be what you mean so as to clarify your reply to me?
P.The reply is always that all the deputies and myself thought the same as to if the post was civil or not.
Q. The reply is from me and there may have been deputies that dissented from my thinking but they have to be subordinated to my thinking so that is why I wrote that you consider that the reply is from >all< of us, even if some dissent.
R. If a deputy dissents from my thinking, they can not post their dissent in the thread where I post my reply, but can email the member that reports the post outside of the forum's babblemail feature.
S. The reply will be determined by my thinking even if 4 deputies out of 6 dissent from my thinking.
You also replied to me that [...An "appeal" (quotes are yours) >should < go directly to me...]
I am unsure as to what this means, so could you clarify if:
H. That means that one >is not allowed here< to appeal to a deputy?
K. that means that your use of quotation marks could be, or could not be,according to conventional grammatical interpretations of the use of quotes, of the nature that you are indicating that there is something according to you that means that your use of quotes is for some other purpose than to quote the word? If so, could you post here that purpose, if any?
L. that means that the use of the quotes is an indication that the administration here is a centralized, with autocritic control, administration where appeals are unlikely because the appeal can only go to the the maker of the post and could be unlikely to overrule himself.
M. something else
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/704782.html

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:715846
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/715846.html