Posted by Lou Pilder on December 6, 2006, at 14:20:40
In reply to Re: Lou's response to-Simple criteria, posted by Honore on December 6, 2006, at 10:00:29
Friends,
It is written here that the poster as far as he/she could tell ,[...this is the |only way| that {any} individual can decide whether to post a link..that may or may not be civil...].
But there is a way written here in the TOS that writes that one can {always} email {Dr.Hsiung}to find out if the post is civil. And does not {always} rule out any request (or requiremnet?} to ask others >first<? Yet today, I am still unsure if DR. Hsiung is rescinding any stipulation to me, be it a request or a requirement, to ask someone else>first< before I can send it to him for a determination. If so, would this not be having a different standard for the posters in the FAQ example than for me here as in the next paragraph?
And is there not in the TOS here a link offered that DR. Hsiung has a member write that one can always ask Dr Hsiung in advance, does it not? Then when Dr. Hsiung asked me to take it to someone else first, then could he have not accepted it then when I originally brought the subject up? If so, then was I denied equal terms of service here? For he did not change his FAQ to include that {all} members are to >first< ask someone else before sending it to him, did he?
So there is a way different from {the only way} offered here by Honore. I ask; (email if you like for this)
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:706108
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/710915.html