Posted by Lou Pilder on November 25, 2006, at 15:45:31
In reply to Never mind, posted by zazenducky on November 22, 2006, at 14:15:17
> I was upset about amie sans vie dying. I don't think these boards are healthy for anyone especially anyone young and vulnerable. I was frankly shocked at the tone Racer took with Deneb.
>
>
> I don't belong here thank God.
>
>
> I'm self blocking.
>
>
> Happy Thanksgiving and Merry Christmas
>
Friends,
The grammatical structure of zazenducky's post leads me to look first at:
[...I was upset at am(i)e sans vie dying...].
The author then goes on to write,[...I don't think that these boards are healthy for anyone especially anyone young and vulneralble...].
In using modern exegesis, one could think,IMO, that the author,zazenducky, is expressing a connection that she/he thinks there is in relation to the two statements. There are possible interpretations from the two statements that could be made. Could one be that zazenducky is saying that [these boards] were in some way connected to the possible mental health of the subject person, {ame sans vie},since ame sans vie could be considered to be a young person? As far as the person being {vulnerable}, there is some speculation to that, but there is a post by ame sans vie giving details of his life that could have the potential, IMO, to lead some to think that he was a vulnerable person, if {vulnerable} means that he was a person of the type that could be emotionally wounded easily by statments made to him by others here. I can not be sure of if zazenducky intended that interpretation.
This leads to the author's statement,[...I was shocked...tone Racer..Deneb...]. I ask: Is there a relation to that statement to the author's previous two statements? I am unsure about that. And she/he writes also that she/he was {shocked} at the tone that Racer took with Deneb. Are the two words, {shocked} and {upset} of the same type of expression? If so, is there a relationship to Zazenducky's two stetemnts? I can not be sure of what is the intended interpretation of the author.
The zazenducky writes,[...I don't belong here thank God..]. This brings up as to what the reasons could be as to what the author has to write that she/he does >not belong< here thank God. I ask:
Does zazenducky mean that this forum is one that contributes to the wounding emotionally of others here and that she/he is saying that she/he is not of that mentality and is leaving so that she/he could not be considered a contributor to that? I am unsure as to the intention of the author here.
But I am also shocked and saddened by the death of ame sans vie. I am also self-blocking.
Lou
>
>
>
>
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:706108
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/707162.html