Posted by Lou Pilder on November 20, 2006, at 13:25:44
In reply to We don't vote on every issue/request, posted by gardenergirl on November 19, 2006, at 22:53:21
Friends,
It is written here,[...we don't..vote before action is taken..multiple opinions are presented..we solicit..others..determinations are made..applying the rules...Dr.(Hsiung)..may..overturn...].
This could bring up the following situations:
A.Suppose a deputy takes the position that the post that is reported is uncivil. But another deputy, via I guess through solicitation among themselves, says that it is civil. The one deputy posts that it is uncivil. Then could not the deputy that thinks that it is civil post that they think that it {is} civil and that others are not to include that deputy in that determination? If the determination is from the "Administration", then since there could be a split in the deputies thinking, then could the determination that the statemet is uncivil could only represent possibly just one deputies opinion?
B. Looking on the other hand, a deputy thinks that the post is civil. Another deputy does not. Could not the deputy that thinks that the post is civil determine that it is civil and thearefore the deputy that thinks that it is uncivil can not post that it is uncivil?
C . If uncivil overides civil, what could be the rationale that could justify that?
D. If determinations are made by applying the rules, then could not posts that could have the rules applied to them, that have not had those rules applied to them, have a note posted in the thread that they appear that there was a rule that could have been applied to them and the rule ws not applied?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:704221
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/705535.html