Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's response to aspects of Josh's post-indicatr

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 12, 2006, at 9:51:51

In reply to Re: Lou's response to aspects ofGlydin's post-red, posted by Jost on November 12, 2006, at 1:53:47

Friends,
One of my requests to Dr. Hsiung is for him to tell me what he thinks about my proposal for him to place an indicator in posts to indicate that a statement is not civil, rather than to make a new post with a {please be civil} statement in it.
I have not seen a post from him to me in the thread where I posted my request for him to write what he thinks spacifically about my proposal.
I think that my proposal is a meritorious to this ongoing dispute here. And I think that another member here did post something that said that a notation could be in order about the posts in question, I think that it was Scott(SLS), so if there was such a post, then I am not alone in thinking that my proposal could be of merit to this discussion.
I think that by DR. Hsiung or his deputy placing a red indicator, like the new member indicator, next to the statement in question, that Dr. Hsiung would not have to do something that is not feasible, for I could send the posts to a deputy and they could do the mechanics. As far as others disputing as to if the statement is civil or not, the aspects of what is accusative or what could lead one to feel put down or what could not be sensitive to the feelings of others are all defined by the past-practice here, so a dispute could be decided by the past practice, rather than a {new argument}.
There have been alterations to the pages here. In one case, Dr. Hsiung modified the page that had statements that put down Christians. I am asking for equal treatmnet as to statements here that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or to accuse Jews or that put down Jews. If Dr. Hsiung can modify the board where the statements that put down Christians were posted, is there some reason that he can not alter or modify a page where there are statements that put down Jews? If so, could you reading here state your rationale for such and then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly? And Dr. Hsiung calls posts from pages that are not the last page here for sanctioning a poster based upon what the poster posted in a page other than the last page.
I think that my proposal could be good for the community as a whole. The statement by Josh,[...further comments {will} be made that could cast some negative light on people of one or another religious or other group...]I would like for anyone interested in my response to that statement to email me if they like.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:702458
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/702780.html