Posted by Lou Pilder on November 11, 2006, at 6:35:10
In reply to To: Dr. Bob, posted by Glydin on November 10, 2006, at 21:37:39
> Thank you for posting notations of: "I have nothing further to say at this time" to reminders posted on the board on subjects that have not been specifically (to that time as some are repeats) addressed.
>
> I had taken an attitude that things that did not receive commentary from you actually were the commentary, however, I think to actually post something is a better way to go and makes things clearer for all of us who participate in this community.
>
Friends,
In looking at the above post here, it is written to Dr. Hsiung,[...Thank you..I had taken the attitude that things that did not receive commentary..were the commentary...to..post something..makes things clearer...].What was one part of my requests, about Dr. Hsiung's rules and policys here, in question as to what Dr. Hsiung posted in reply to my request for him to clarify what he wrote here in regards to my requests to him, was something like,[..I have nothing to add at this time...].
In the reminder that I posted for Dr. Hsiung to reply to me, I had requested for him to clear up the uncertainty that I have in regards to his rules and policy here for me and others being allowed to submit posts in advance to him for a determination of acceptability without an added condition that I, or I guess others also, ask another here first for them , I guess, to give their opinion. This condition is not expressed in the FAQ, for that writes that one can always ask Dr. Hsiung or a deputy if a post is OK without the additional condition requested that Dr. Hsiung has posted to me.
I would like to participate here , but I would like to do so within the rules here. in order for me to be within the rules here, I would like to know what they are as to in this case, the submitting of a post in advance to see if it is OK and if I must have a member give me their opinion or not before I can do that.
Since the FAQ says that one can always submit a post to Dr. Hsiung or a deputy in advance to see if it is OK and with Dr. Hsiung asking me to have another give me their opinion first, that leaves me with a want for clarification as to if it is a requierment to me to have someone review it first before I have Dr. hsiung review it in advance, or not.
The post in important to me to have reviewd in advance because it is a link that is a response from the Anti-Defamation League as to the Jewish perspective as to statements here that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings and have the potential IMO to foster defamation toward Jews and me here if the statements in question are not addressed by the administration as being uncivil as in the same fashion and manner as other posts here that are addressed as uncivil that accuse, put down or are not sensitive to the feelings of others. For a list of posts that have the potential IMO to arouse ill-will toward me here, you could email me if you like.
Dr. Hsiung has made new rules here about posting links and the administrative board is his invitation here to address policy and rules for clarification of them, and I am asking for the clarification because it is unclear to me as to if Dr. Hsiung has rescinded his request to me to ask someone else first before I send him the link in question in advance to see if it is OK or not to post it so that I can stay within the rules here.
The poster that innitiated this thread writes,[...to post something makes it clearer...] I agree that to post a yes or a no to a question that I have to clear up to me if one can or can not send a post in advance to Dr. Hsiung without having to have to send it first to another is IMO a resaonable request about the policy maker's statement to me about his statement to me about asking another first. The poster also wrote something like that if there was no commentary from DR. Hsiung to requests to him about his administrative policy here, that things that did not receive commentary were the commentary, but also wrote that to post something makes things clearer.
There could be many interpretations to what the poster and to what Dr. Hsiung has posted to me here could mean. I ask;
A. Does Dr. Hsiung's reply to me mean that my question, as to if I have the condition to me to ask another first before he will review a post of mine in advance to determine if it is OK or not, is answerd with a yes or a no? If so, Do I have to ask someone first or not and what as to what he wrote substantuates a conclusion to that?
B. Does it mean that he has not determined yet as to if I can or can not send him the post in advance, and he will post an answer to me at a later time? If so, what could be a substantiation of that conclusion?
C. Does it mean that he is saying that what he has already posted about his policy is all I need to determine if I need to ask someone else first or not in order to have him review the link in advance that I would like to post? If so, could clarification be given here as to the two statements by Dr. Hsiung;
1. In the FAQ,[..one can always send to Dr. Hsiung or a deputy in advance...]
2. In Dr. Hsiung's statement to me,[...could you ask someone else first before sending it to me?...]makes it clear that I can or can not send the post in advance to have Dr. Hsiung OK it or not? If so, what is the rational for any conclusion arrived at?
D. other interpretations
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:702458
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/702506.html