Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Do more rules make for a more civil society?

Posted by Jost on October 22, 2006, at 20:00:24

In reply to Do more rules make for a more civil society?, posted by Toph on October 22, 2006, at 13:05:44

Have the regulations per se actually burgeoned so much?

Probably there isn't a correspondence between the burgeoning of rules and fairness and justice. It probably depends on the fairness and justness of those who enforce the rules-- at least as much as the number or complexity of rules

plus common law has always been very complex--

The things is-- it's really a question of whether Bob is fair-- not whether the rules are fair-- or overly numerous-- at least so far. I'm not sure I see unfair rules--

maybe they are, but I dont' see it yet.

I mean is 10 a good number to divide by? ???? I can't even begin to figure out how to address that question. What' s good about it? what's not good?

The rounding up, rounding down point seems useful -- and worth considering-- ie the whole question of the mathematics of the blocking system-- from a philosophical point of view-- dividers, multipliers, rounding errors, etc--

were those issues discussed, explained? Bob presumably thought it through-- but how to legitimate it, point by point, and debate it, point by point-- on a message board--?

& is it unfair, or unprincipled? Maybe it's fairer not to let everyone here get so stirred up about the fairness of things-- because it inflames situations and people get blocked because they saw an opening to protest something-- and got more agitated during that process of protesting--

but then-- well-- we feel shut down-- even though no one gets blocked.

Should blocks be tailored more to individual actions-- and, more significantly, supposed intentions?-- can be "fairer"-- but involves judgments that can also be harmful-- now Bob can say, it's not personal-- but if it's not personal, it's impersonal-- and the blocks seem mechanical and unqualified, the punishment doesn't fit the crime, then

The whole thing is such a hard question to consider. Even for a consequentialist , much less rights-based, morality.

Jost


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Jost thread:696754
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/696866.html