Posted by Dr. Bob on October 16, 2006, at 10:24:57
In reply to Lou's response to aspects of gardenergirl's post-B, posted by Lou Pilder on October 15, 2006, at 21:42:31
> The TOS in the FAQ indicates to me that Dr. Hsiung has in his policy that [...one can >always< ask me to find out if a post is OK...].
Could you point out where exactly it indicates that?
> A. How many others am I to ask?
> B. What am I to ask them?
> C. Do the posters have to be a cross-section of the more knowlegable population here?
> D. Do I ask them by email or babblemail or on the board?
> E. Is this something that could constitute a vote as to if the post is civil or if the statements that I would like to post the response to have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or not?
> F. What kind of bias factor, if any, can be used for the population?
> G. Does Dr. Hsiung seek a concensus to make decisions as to if posts are civil or not here?
> H. If not, then why am I asked to ask others before I send it to him when the consensus was published in 1947 and has been taught in schools since then, books have been written, movies made, amd the Pope recently repudiated any doctrine that has the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings?Could you ask one other person what they think about you posting that URL? And do so off the board, since asking on the board would mean posting the URL...
Would anyone like to volunteer to be asked?
Bob
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:688245
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/695254.html