Posted by NikkiT2 on October 12, 2006, at 0:53:02
In reply to Re: Apples and oranges and bears, oh my! » fayeroe, posted by gardenergirl on October 11, 2006, at 23:29:38
>>One test is to ask if the policy is {just}.
Yes, it is just. It is just for the posters as well as the "moderators"
>>Another test is to ask if the policy is {rational}.
But yes, it is *incredibly* rational. It is protecting the health of the mods as well as the posters. It is not saying a problem would be *ignored*. It is saying tht x and y don't have to deal with it, but that z will.
THATS if there is a problem.>>Another is to ask if it is {appropriate}.
Yes. It is appropriate. For same reasns as stated above.
>>Another is to ask if it is {generally acceptable}.
Yes. It is.
>>But the most impotant test, is to ask if the policy disregards one's Human Rights.
I presume this is meant "does it disregard Lou's Human Rights".
And no, not in any way. If Lou were here for safety reasons (ie, he could physcially not leave here for safety, health, or political reasons), and if Lou were not here by 100% choice, then maybe. But Lou is here by choice ALONE. No other reason. Like the rest of us. Its choice.Its the internet for whatsits sake.. Its the free world. Anything goes.
Nikki
poster:NikkiT2
thread:693800
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/694025.html