Posted by SLS on September 16, 2006, at 9:04:04
In reply to Re: How about..., posted by SLS on September 16, 2006, at 7:44:10
> > i meant that bob could reply to the post (like he does now). his post would show up tagged on the bottom of the thread. that was what i meant...
>
> You mean bring the past into the present...
>
> ...with no limitation as to how far back in time a post was submitted.
>
> That is precisely what I think should not be done. To "correct" the archives, if a regular PBC could not be inserted into the thread,***
What I meant here was to insert the PBC post immediately after the sanctioned post within the thread rather than append it to the end of the thread as the most recent submission.
***
> then I would be in favor of either editing the subject header or editing the post and placing appropriate text at the top of the submission. Of course, this problem could be obviated if posts older than 3 weeks were simply left to the discretion of the head moderator for sanction, and posts older than 1 year not to be considered.
>
> > > Currently, there are no limits for how many requests one can make if they are all accepted. This might present problems with volume of requests if the entire archive is subject to review.
>
> > there haven't been that many oversights - have there? i guess rules have changed over time... people used to be allowed to swear it seems. i'm not sure how useful it would be to go back through that... maybe there could be something in the faq about how you used to be able to but then the rules changed and that would be a way out of doing the every individual post thing.
> >
> > maybe bob could process them slowly... a few at a time or something like that.
> >
> > i dunno.
>
>
> Yeah. Headaches. Wow.
>
> 3 weeks / 1 year
>
>
> - Scott
poster:SLS
thread:682301
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060826/msgs/686501.html