Posted by SLS on September 14, 2006, at 0:17:56
In reply to Re: desire to disengage, posted by Dr. Bob on September 13, 2006, at 14:25:40
> > It's rarely a mutual desire to disengage, Dr. Bob, or there'd be no need for a DNP. It's usually a desire by one party to disengage, and it works rather well since the party requesting the DNP can't post to the DNP recipient either, thus allowing a cooling off period.
>
> The desire to disengage could be mutual, but difficulty actually disengaging could be mutual, too. If just one party wants to disengage, would it help if they could post a DNP to themselves?I should think that it would be desirable to alert the recipient of the DNP request by addressing the post to him. Actually, I would consider this a rather necessary requesite if there are sanctions to be issued for failure to comply with such a request. I don't think it would be legal for me to be fined for not complying with a court order that was mailed to the court house.
- Scott
poster:SLS
thread:680734
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060826/msgs/685770.html