Posted by Lou Pilder on September 13, 2006, at 5:40:44 [reposted on September 13, 2006, at 14:47:25 | original URL]
In reply to Redirect: what URLs can or can not be posted, posted by Dr. Bob on September 12, 2006, at 9:06:57
DR. Hsiung,
You wrote in the link that you offer here something like that [...if you could post it without being in a URL, then you could post it with being in a URL...].
But there now are new rules in regards to a URL that I posted that showed how historical propaganda tactics were used as being state-sponsored to arrouse antisemitic feelings throughout an entire country. I had posted the same in the past and there was no mention by the administration as to the URL having uncivil content. So is there not a change in the administration concerning the posting of a URL to historical events?
If so, then I could possibly not post a URL to show historical use of the accusation made to the Jews in question here?
I ask:
A. That it made available to me to have the post that I would like to be included in the posts that have accusations made toward the Jews here be reviewed by you before I post it.
B. That you post an explaination in the FAQ here as to why a URL of a historical event that I posted before, is not allowed, now, to be posted here.
C. That the 3-consecutive post rule be changed to 3 consecutive posts, but after 12 hours pass, the rule starts over.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:682301
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060826/msgs/685632.html