Posted by Estella on August 31, 2006, at 20:37:02
In reply to Lou solves post restoration-ramifications, posted by Lou Pilder on August 31, 2006, at 19:59:38
Er... Just to check what you want to do.
You think there have been posts that defamed Jews.
Those posts have 'gone missing'.
You think you can restore them.
You want to restore them (to post them on the boards).If you feel offended by the posts then why do you want them on the boards?
Why aren't you just happy that they aren't on the boards anymore?
> I was wondering if I could use someone to post after 3 posts so as to have my perspective included, without waiting, as of what those statements purport?
I think that is kind of not in the spirit of the three post rule. I figure that the idea of the three post rule is that if people have posted three posts then they do have to wait to say anymore. That way other people get a chance to say something. That way if other people don't have anything to add then that first person has to stop.
You want to tell us about how you think these statements defame Jews?
> I think that this way could be good for the community as a whole, for there could be a balance of perspectives shown then.
I think the idea of the three post rule is to ensure that there are a balance of perspectives.
Is this really what is going on?
poster:Estella
thread:681816
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060826/msgs/681864.html