Re: precedent for this » Dr. Bob

Posted by special_k on April 8, 2006, at 7:37:19

In reply to Re: precedent for this, posted by Dr. Bob on April 8, 2006, at 6:19:58

> There's precedent for this, too.
well then that makes it hard and hard to figure why sometimes things go without comment whereas othertimes people get blocked for two weeks.
> And it wouldn't accomplish much if any page except an order form could be linked to. And being able to obtain medications from a site is different from something being said anywhere there, it's easier to determine and less subject to change.
ok. so now that that is clearer... couldn't you update the faq's... give the guy a warning... and give him two weeks if he does it again?

Thread

Madness Peeddoofff 4/3/06
Re: blocked for 2 weeks » Dr. Bob Jakeman 4/3/06
Posting while blocked---willyee gardenergirl 4/3/06
Re: blocked for 2 weeks yxibow 4/4/06
Re: blocked for 2 weeks yxibow 4/4/06
Deputy conflict of interest » yxibow gardenergirl 4/4/06
Re: Madness ed_uk 4/4/06
Re: Deputy conflict of interest » gardenergirl yxibow 4/5/06
Re: Deputy conflict of interest » yxibow yxibow 4/5/06
Re: something i dident think about Dr. Bob 4/7/06
sorry to butt in here but if i understand this... » Dr. Bob special_k 4/7/06
Re: precedent for this Dr. Bob 4/8/06
Re: precedent for this » Dr. Bob special_k 4/8/06

Post a new follow-up

[630499]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:special_k thread:628522
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs/630499.html