Posted by chemist on September 28, 2005, at 18:25:22
hello there, chemist here...a ruling from the court, please...i am understanding less in re: DNP than i thought i did upon mr. hoover's departure from these parts...perhaps 1.5 years ago, PB persona ``fayeroe'' made it abundantly clear to me that she did not welcome any posts emanating from me toward her: i have complied to the letter.
why, then, is there babblemail emanating from ``fayeroe'' in my inbox? the contents - available for public viewing, contact my ISP for the best VRFY i can offer - are none too nice, nor too naughty. and this longhorn does not care to hear from any okies - today or any other day.
in any event: is the use of babblemail as invoked by ``fayeroe'' - a PB tool (babblemail, not ``fayeroe''), and not the same as going about it via external routes (``real'' email) or avoiding making a post - ``legal'' in this regard?
if the woman in question wishes to hound me in private life, she ought to do it without using PB as a mail relay server and with the aid of an attorney: there are no shortage of people who will gladly provide to you my email addresses other than the one pointed to by the PB domain, as ``fayeroe'' is not alone in her dislike of yours truly...
all the best, and eagerly awaiting the ruling,
chemist
poster:chemist
thread:560751
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050823/msgs/560751.html