Posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 5:50:47
In reply to Re: I think it's Ridiculous Nick » Nickengland, posted by MCK on August 4, 2005, at 20:36:27
Hello again MCK - And please like I say before if you prefer I do not use mannors to address you to say 'hello' request otherwise and i'll jump straght into the message.
>No, you indirectly gave the same message to Barosky, but of course anyone who has similar criticisms to SO must be SO therefore I guess according to your standards it's okay for you to infer that they all should go elsewhere.This I think is what is called jumping to the wrong conclusions.
"of course anyone who has similar criticisms to SO must be SO therefore I guess according to your standards it's okay for you to infer that they all should go elsewhere."
No, I have never before and should not be proven guilty for the future of my actions that I will accuse 'anyone' in the future that if they have similar criticisms they must be 'so'
I did indeed say in that message you replyed too..
>That is the only case where I personally will say people might be better off elsewhere, is when someone threatens the whole entire existance of this site and everyone in it, that they could possibly be better off elsewhere.
Hence "this is the only case"
If you want to know more about my standards i'll tell you this. I was in mid conversation with 'so' when he/she got blocked and he/she never got the chance to answer some of my questions. There was certain things that stuck in my mind with what 'so' said upon his return.
i.e 'so' said something along the lines of, upon his return he will not make himself known that 'he' has returned...he knows covert ways to hide himself etc etc I can't remember the exact words but it was more or less something along the lines that he wasn't exactly going to post back with "hi, im 'so', im back from from block how is everyone?" You get what I mean. Now when I saw what I thought barosky's post was similar and he more or less agreed some parts of it were as well too. I posted that I thought it was a coincidence.
I asked Gabbi a similar question eariler on as she said that it could not be 'so' that is incorrect. I asked how she would know, but she prefered not to comment on how she could be certain it was not. I'm still left with curosity and for the record I look forward to speaking with 'so' again as he really got me thinking when I coresponded with him, with regards to some areas of discussion we had together.
This does not mean that now i'm going to accuse everyone that they are 'so' so please don't jump to conclusions about my standards, as I am not judging yours.
Kind regards
Nick
poster:Nickengland
thread:534688
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050728/msgs/537760.html