Posted by Lou Pilder on August 4, 2005, at 9:11:02
In reply to Lou's response to aspects of this thread-ruloutLu?, posted by Lou Pilder on August 4, 2005, at 8:52:18
Dr. Hsiung and Friends,
I am requesting that you take the following into consideration if you are going to reply to this thread.
It is written here,[...the 3 rule...].
If this is about NikkiT2's posts that I have requested that you write a determination as to being acceptable here or not, and if I have requested from Dr. Hsiung 4, I remember that Dr. Hsiung did not reply to one of my requests about one of NikkiT2's posts as to it being acceptable or not.
It is my understanding then, that I have not reached the {more than 3 } aspect even if I requested a determination about another post by NikkiT2, which I do not believe that I have done. If there is one, then I think that it would then fill the place of the post that Dr. Hsiung did not reply with a determination as to it being acceptable or not here.
Also, I remember writing something about the unconstitutional aspect of {Ex-Post Facto} in relation to Dr. Hsiung's rule that he has made here.
Also, I would like for anyone here to take into consideration if they are going to respond to this thread that I remember a post by NikkiT2 that stated something like that she would have no objections to me to bring up posts of hers here. I believe that was a few weeks ago about posts having the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings. If anyone can post the URL to that, I would appreciate it.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:537380
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050728/msgs/537408.html