Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Lou's reply to so's question for Lou

Posted by so on June 15, 2005, at 19:50:17

In reply to Lou's reply to so's question for Lou » so, posted by Lou Pilder on June 15, 2005, at 13:04:57

> So, If I read your post to me correctly, is it correct that?:
> A. You think that my posts about requesting from Dr. Hsiung a determination are valuable, at least to you. Then do you want my posts to be subject to any policy that could have the effect of deminishing or silencing me from making those requests to Dr. Hsiung on the administrative board?

No, not in the least. Others find support and education in other interactions here, but I find you sustained effort to explore the your situation the singularly most supportive interaction on this board, as it informs my effort to continue living in a world, in the most gracious analysis, just doesn't share my values.

> B. I am now focusing on another type of post. What is that type of post?

Maybe they are posts with a bit more prose and wtih a bit less method. It is also probably a bit riskier - maybe not for you emotionally, but in the context of preserving your permission to post here, the more original untried phrases you publish, simply by the law of large numbers, one is more likely to become the subject of administrative criticism.


> C. I am voluntarily limiting my posts like the one's objected to here, out of sympathy to those objecting to them. My answer is, [...in a sense...].

I know we are sometimes motivated by mulitiple causes. It's not that I would suggest you are any less sympathetic any other time ... I don't know what it says that I recognize that we are more sympathetic to things we know about. If a tree falls in the forest does anybody hear?

> But could you answer this?
> If those in that group that want me to only be able to post a limited number, such as 3, do you think that that group of posters should also be limited to 3 posts for their entire group about them wanting to have them limited?

That would seem equilateral. Fairness often embodies equilateral treatment.

> Lou


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:so thread:513069
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050614/msgs/513348.html