Posted by Minnie-Haha on June 12, 2005, at 15:13:25
In reply to Sorry to interupt -- any chance we could..., posted by Racer on June 12, 2005, at 14:01:58
> actually comment on the suggestion I made?
I'm game! I think your suggestion should be considered (along with the 3-complaint rule and other suggestions that have been made http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050530/msgs/511053.html ). I would think it should apply to people who want to challenge a post that 1) was not directed at them, 2) was not about them, and 3) was in a thread (or part of a thread) that they were not actively participating in. I think if conditions 1, 2, or 3 are true (was directed at them, was about them, or was in a thread/part of a thread that they were active in), the challenger should be able to make a public challenge, or to use your plan, if they wished.
> The Civility Monitor could be a rotating responsibility of the Deputies and Dr Bob…
I need to think more about how the civility monitor would work, but I’m generally OK with it.
> I do think that so's idea of some sort of public statistical analysis of the sorts of reports made would be a good idea… I don't like the idea of anonymous complaints, though, because I think it has the potential to lead to people unwilling to take responsibility for their own actions.
Agree.
I guess what I’m saying is, I’m open to suggestions… there have been plenty of good ones (including yours) that may only need a little logical thought and tweaking to work. Try ‘em… if they don’t work, try something else.
poster:Minnie-Haha
thread:511073
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050530/msgs/511559.html