Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: hypothesizing » Dr. Bob

Posted by Spoc on April 12, 2005, at 1:28:19

In reply to Re: hypothesizing, posted by Dr. Bob on April 11, 2005, at 9:52:51

Thanks for the ride (it would probably have been better not to allude to how I didn't need or want one). Thing is, it's not like light was shed on something over here.

> it's important for people to be careful, if they post such hypotheses, that others don't accused or put down.

This is what was just retired, not an answer to anything asked, wondered about or needed. But as far as what you say here, ironic that once again the actual pool of such things was let go.

If you wanted to respond, why not make it to something I actually mentioned. Like why this was a PBC, instead of, if anything at all, just a Please Rephrase. It does make a difference, based on the classic uneven referencing and application of such things, often without warning, at any point whatsoever down the road.

> what was problematic was how the thread evolved from there...
>
> Bob

Thanks for sharing but you obviously have me mixed up with someone else.


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


[483175]

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Spoc thread:482726
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050323/msgs/483175.html