Posted by used2b on April 3, 2005, at 16:44:17
In reply to Re: Different boards » used2b, posted by gardenergirl on April 3, 2005, at 15:51:35
>
> It's one thing to report and process your own reactions to your experience on another board and to give and receive support about the same. But must that board be named?
>
> gg
>
Would you suggest that a prohibition against mentioning names or brands should be limited to medical personnel and on-line discussion boards, or should it extend to pharmaceuticals, other medical products and all Web sites? Will people feel hurt if a medicine they use is mentioned by name and criticized? Are we to avoid criticizing the content of specific drug advertising?In reading your several citations of my postings, I don't fully understand your interest in my responses. I offered what seemed to be normal consideration of the provinence of what turns out to be a parody published on the Internet.
Discussing provinence of any idea seems educational, and supportive if others have expressed a similar interest. The scope of the provinence of the parodistic construct includes its origins and its originators.
If someone felt hurt by a parody, it seems to me supportive to inform them of remedies for their injury. Since I was not the one to introduce what you characterize as a violation of a convention about naming specific therapists, perhaps it would help your argument to cite the actual introduction of the name or Website you want excluded.
poster:used2b
thread:479358
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050323/msgs/479375.html