Posted by fires on February 26, 2005, at 17:16:20
In reply to Re: another thing to ponder » fires, posted by alexandra_k on February 26, 2005, at 15:41:20
>>There is also the point that for every scientific book that says that something is a pseudo-science there is probably another scientific book that says that that same thing isn't a pseudo-science.
Maybe with some "border" things, but I've found that books that support pseudoscience are generall y psuedoscientific.
I'm not feeling too well, I may stop posting without further notice.
poster:fires
thread:461256
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050219/msgs/463852.html