Posted by Lou Pilder on December 3, 2004, at 5:17:33
In reply to Re: doesn't mean he agrees, posted by Dr. Bob on December 3, 2004, at 4:49:52
> > I would assume that if something is brought to Dr. Bob's attention and he does nothing that he thought it was not against the rules. But that doesn't mean he agrees with what was said.
>
> Right:
>
> > The only messages I take responsibility for are my own.
>
> Bob
R. Hsiung,
In the above reply by you to another poster, the other poster thinks that if you do not reply to a request about acceptability of a post, then your not replying means that what was written is not against the rules.
Does this mean , then, that since you have not replied to my request for a determination as to the acceptability of the post in question that it is not against the rules here to write that someone here is a "fruitcake" and an "idiot"?
If you could clarify that, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:423270
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/423772.html