Posted by Lou Pilder on November 7, 2004, at 11:39:59
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on November 5, 2004, at 15:47:23
Dr. Hsiung,
I wrote to you in this thread that I could not determine if you had written a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum for two posts directed to me by NikkiT2. In that post from me to you, which is the original post in this thread, I also wrote,in regards to your reply to me that I reviewed,[...Does that mean that the other two posts that I had asked you to comment on...are acceptable or not...in relation to the guidlines of the forum...?].
One of your replies to me concerning the acceptability of the two posts on question as to my not being able to find a determination as to if they are acceptable or not was:
[...if addressing...one of a number of posts, is enough to deciede what to do, then I may leave it at that...].
One of my requests, in light of your replies to me, could be cleared up, to me at least, if you could clarify this by you telling me if:
A. any of your replies to me means that you will not give a determination as to if the posts in question are acceptable or not
B. any of your replies to me means that the posts are both not acceptable here in relation to the guidlines of the forum
C. any of your replies to me means that the posts are both acceptable here in relation to the guidlines of the forum
D. any of your replies to me means that there is a split of the two posts as to one being acceptable and the other not acceptablr
E. None of the above
G. a combination of the above
The following posts may or may not be relavant to this discussion.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/410280.html
In that post from me to you there is a correction to the first link given in a nother post. The correction is:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/403873.html
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:412027
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/412890.html