Posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2004, at 17:18:48
In reply to Lou's response to Mark H. » Mark H., posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2004, at 16:49:46
Mark H.
You wrote, [...100 posts to write...].
Well, I now think that I could take the 100 posts and have someone help me in putting them into 7 very long posts, but not 3.
You wrote,[...not free to refute another's belief on the faith board...].
I did intend to start a new thread and tell why the jews are not replaced by anyone in the eyes of their God . I just gave one post that has been posted as an example , the one that had,[... top 10 worst reasons for organized religion...] and then in the list,[...to foster any agenda that is not centered in Christ...].
It is not that I want to refute that statement, for as as Jew my faith is fostering an agenda that is not centered in Christ,and I do not feel that the agenda of my faith, Jewdaism, is to be posted in a list of [..."worst" reasons for an organized religion...]but to have the administration either delete the statement in question or attatch some kind of statement that the statement in question is not acceptable to be posted here.
I disagree if you are saying that I should tell a poster that something that they wrote is not acceptable, for I believe that it is an admimistrative function and that is why I request a determination from the administration for that.
I have a master's in school administration and I base my reasoning on that concept. Perhaps here one can tell another that they are posting something that is not acceptable, but I feel that is for the administration to do.
So if you look at some of my recent threads, they are as a result of my request to the administration to make a dtermination as to if a post is acceptable here or not. That is what I would like to post.
Best regards,
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:401489
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/401755.html