Posted by Lou Pilder on September 19, 2004, at 17:58:30
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-political posts, posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2004, at 23:14:54
Dr. Hsiung,
Let us reason together. We both agree that the board is for support. I am asking you, is the following supportive?
A.(subject line) {Paging {Dubya} Bush??}
B.[...the masses {cannot see through this}...]
C. "reelected"
D.[...horrific policies...]
E. [...when social security finally fails...]
F.[...human being...with so little going for him ever had so many breaks?...].
G. [...born under lucky star with ...silver spoon in his...].
H.[...be working selling used cars for a living...].
I. Others possibly missed
Where is there a line drawn here that permits this type of post? Does it not put down used car salepeople? Is it not accusitive?
Are the masses all unable to see what the poster writes , or is the poster's statement in (B) putting down the masses?
Would this be permissible here? [...if Bush would not have been born into the Bush family, he'd probably be working as a teacher...]
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20040914/msgs/392707.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:392487
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/392717.html