Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: requests not to be posted to

Posted by Dr. Bob on September 7, 2004, at 23:07:37

In reply to Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob, posted by Larry Hoover on September 7, 2004, at 8:18:12

> Is it acceptable to address specific factual questions to a poster who has been asked to not post to me, under the expectation that a factual reply is permitted, but an ad hominem reply is a violation of the "do not post to me" request?

No, as Dinah explained.

> replying to a factual component of the thread is not a violation of the "do not post" rule.
>
> > Posting to someone means directing either the subject line or the body of a post to them. Replying to posts by someone isn't necessarily posting to them.

I consider directing a post to someone to be posting to them, whatever the subject matter.

> that's explicitly what I was trying to do. Steer the poster to facts/contended implications, or don't post (in reply to me) at all.

What if you just replied to facts/contended implications?

Bob


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:387548
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/387886.html