Posted by AuntieMel on August 31, 2004, at 17:18:10
In reply to Re: sarcasm, doubling, and positive results, posted by Dr. Bob on August 31, 2004, at 13:20:50
Back during the 'big fires debate' there were many here that wanted him sanctioned for what he was writing. This didn't happen, rightly IMO, because he hadn't broken any objective rules and intent was too subjective.
Now chemist gets blocked for a subjective ruling that he was being sarcastic. Nothing that can be pointed at that any realistic person would agree is accusitory, foul, mean, attacking or whatever.
All of this *after* he posted on admin wanting someone to nip the whole thing in the bud and no help was forthcoming.
Oy.
poster:AuntieMel
thread:384533
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040717/msgs/384896.html