Re: fires' block » AuntieMel

Posted by Dr. Bob on August 14, 2004, at 14:06:44

In reply to Re: Re: First let me... please read, Rod! » JenStar, posted by AuntieMel on August 13, 2004, at 15:51:48

> It's fires' block that I can't seem to get a complete explanation of. It was called deemed 'jumping to conclusions about others' and 'insensitive' when he seemed to me to be just excited about a bunch of psychologists causing a rucus at a convention by saying things that fires had also believed.
Something like that would've been fine:
> I was excited about a bunch of psychologists causing a rucus at a convention by saying things that I also believed.
Expressing oneself in alternative ways can make a big difference...
Bob

Thread

Re: blocked for week - fires - confused » Dr. Bob AuntieMel 8/12/04
Re: blocked for week - fires - confused » AuntieMel partlycloudy 8/12/04
Re: blocked for week - fires - confused » AuntieMel Aphrodite 8/12/04
Re: For PC and Aphrodite And Dr. Bob. AuntieMel 8/13/04
Re: allowed topics Dr. Bob 8/13/04
Re: allowed topics » Dr. Bob AuntieMel 8/13/04
Re: allowed topics Dr. Bob 8/14/04
Re: fires' block » AuntieMel Dr. Bob 8/14/04

Post a new follow-up

[377627]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:376809
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040717/msgs/377627.html

	for
in