Re: civil? » shar

Posted by Larry Hoover on May 13, 2004, at 13:21:59

In reply to civil?, posted by shar on May 11, 2004, at 16:42:16

> > I miss the cantancorousness of Larry-Hoover and Zen-Hussey
> >
> (Please be clear.... » finelinebob
>
> Posted by 64bowtie on May 9, 2004, at 4:24:28
>
> In reply to http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20040503/msgs/344993.html)
> ............................................
> The above statement is from a post from Rod/64 Bowtie on Psychology. While it may have been meant with some sort of 'affection,' I don't believe it meets the standards of civility (isn't it just name-calling?). It seems like it could make someone feel demeaned/put-down/defensive.
>
> One part I especially do not like is that Zen is not here to comment on her own behalf. It could be that it wouldn't be a big deal to her, but I hate seeing her called names to which she is unable to respond because she's blocked. Certainly being blocked doesn't give those of us here license to take advantage of someone's inability to reply.
>
> Civil or not?
> Thanks,
> Shar
Not.
Hypocrite Bob said: "I don't think it would work to administrate based on intent, so I go by words." But the words were directed at certain people. 'Nuff said.
Lar

Thread

civil? shar 5/11/04
Re: civil? » shar gabbix2 5/11/04
Re: civil? » shar Larry Hoover 5/13/04
Re: civil? » Larry Hoover chemist 5/14/04
Re: civil? » chemist Larry Hoover 5/14/04
Re: civil? » Larry Hoover chemist 5/14/04
Re: not civil Dr. Bob 5/15/04
Re: not civil » Dr. Bob crushedout 5/16/04
Re: not blocked Dr. Bob 5/18/04
not blocked --- again thanx for the clean board (nm) » Dr. Bob 64bowtie 5/21/04

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Larry Hoover thread:345839
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040307/msgs/346476.html

	for
in