Posted by Lou Pilder on August 22, 2003, at 15:08:07
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Susan J's post, posted by jlo820 on August 22, 2003, at 14:41:18
Jlo 820,
You wrote that my request to Susan J for clarification was in your thinking sarcastic. On the contrary. Susan J is representing herself as an attorny and it is my understanding that an attorney would have facts to base a conclusion on and she said that she made a conclusion that she did not tghink that anyone was making defaming statements to me. That cou;d mean that her being an attorney that she could have reserched the site thgrough the serch function to see for herslf and I made a request to her asking if she did. She wrote back that she did not. That means that her conclusion was not based on her actually examiming posts that go back 2 years or so and let me know that her conclusion was not based on that which was important to me for if an attorny is going to say something, they useually are not going to say something that they do not have some foundation to rest on and if it was true that she did do such an examination, then that would be something that would be extreamly relevant to that discussion.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:253019
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030808/msgs/253166.html